Laravel is one of the most popular frameworks for building web applications, which is good news if you are hiring: there are many developers to choose from. It is also a challenge, because popularity means a wide range of quality. Anyone can list Laravel on a profile. The difference between a developer who can follow a tutorial and one who can build and maintain a reliable business system is large, and it is rarely visible in a short conversation.
This guide helps you hire well, even if you are not technical yourself. It covers what a good Laravel developer actually knows, how to assess skills, which questions reveal depth, how to run a fair trial, the engagement models available and the warning signs to watch for. If you would rather skip the search, our page on how to hire Laravel developers describes how we place and manage them.
First, define what you need
Before you look for a person, be clear about the work. The right developer for a small content site is not the right one for a multi-role business platform.
Write down:
- What you are building. A portal, booking system, marketplace, API, internal tool or SaaS product.
- Whether it is new or existing. Maintaining and improving a codebase needs different strengths from starting fresh.
- The size and duration. A short project, a steady roadmap or ongoing support.
- The surrounding skills. Do you also need front-end work, design, testing or server management?
- Your team. Will the developer work alone, or alongside others?
A clear brief helps you judge candidates against the same yardstick. The approach in how to write a software requirements document works well here.
Levels of experience
Developers fall roughly into three groups.
Junior. Comfortable with basic Laravel features and following instructions. Good for small, well-defined tasks under supervision. Not suited to designing a system alone.
Mid-level. Can build features independently, write tests and work through problems. Reliable for most application work with occasional guidance on architecture.
Senior. Designs the structure of a system, anticipates problems, reviews others' work and communicates trade-offs. Worth the higher cost for new products, complex systems and anything with security or scale concerns.
Hire at the level the work demands. A senior developer on a trivial task wastes budget; a junior developer designing a payment system is a risk.
The skills that matter
Core Laravel and PHP
Look for practical fluency in the parts of Laravel that real projects rely on.
- Eloquent and database design. Relationships, migrations, sensible schemas and efficient queries.
- Routing, controllers and validation. Clean structure, and input that is always validated.
- Authentication and authorisation. Login, roles and permissions, done safely.
- Queues and scheduling. Moving slow work, such as emails and reports, out of the user's request.
- Caching. Knowing when and how to use it.
- APIs. Building and documenting interfaces for mobile apps and other services.
- Modern PHP. Current language features, not code written for old versions.
Quality practices
These separate professionals from hobbyists.
- Automated testing. Tests for the parts that matter most, such as payments, permissions and core rules.
- Version control. Comfortable with Git, branches and pull requests.
- Code review. Gives and receives it without ego.
- Clean code. Readable, consistent and documented where it counts.
- Security awareness. Understands common vulnerabilities such as injection, cross-site scripting and broken access control.
The surrounding stack
Most projects need more than Laravel itself.
- Databases: MySQL or PostgreSQL, indexing and query tuning.
- Front end: Blade, and often Vue or React for richer interfaces.
- Deployment: servers, containers such as Docker, cloud hosting and continuous delivery.
- Third-party services: payment providers, email, storage and mapping.
Soft skills
Do not underestimate these.
- Communication. Explains problems and choices in plain language.
- Ownership. Takes responsibility for the outcome, not just the task.
- Honesty. Raises risks and delays early.
- Curiosity about the business. Asks why, not only how.
A technically strong developer who hides problems is more dangerous than an average one who reports them promptly.
Where to find developers
Each source has strengths and weaknesses.
| Source | Strengths | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Freelance marketplaces | Fast, many candidates | Quality varies widely, continuity risk |
| Referrals | Trusted, pre-filtered | Small pool |
| Developer communities | Engaged, skilled people | Takes time to cultivate |
| Recruiters | Do the screening | Cost, may not assess technically |
| Software companies | Teams, continuity, management | Choose the company carefully |
For many businesses, working through a software company reduces risk, because replacement, management and quality control sit with the provider. The trade-offs are explained in dedicated team vs freelancers vs in-house developers.
How to assess a candidate without being technical
You can learn a lot without reading a line of code.
Look at real work
Ask to see projects they built, and ask about their specific role. What problem was it solving? What was hardest? What would they change? Real experience produces specific, confident answers; borrowed credit produces vague ones.
Review their code, or have someone review it
If possible, ask a trusted technical adviser to look at a sample: a public repository, a code sample or a small exercise. Look for readable structure, sensible naming, tests and consistency.
Notice how they communicate
During conversations, watch whether they:
- Ask about your goals and users before proposing solutions.
- Explain technical points clearly.
- Admit what they do not know.
- Give realistic, reasoned estimates.
- Raise risks rather than only saying yes.
Interview questions that reveal depth
These questions work for technical and non-technical interviewers alike, because you are listening for reasoning, not memorised facts.
- "Walk me through a Laravel project you are proud of. What was difficult?" Listen for specifics and honest difficulty.
- "How do you decide how to structure the database for a new feature?" Good answers mention relationships, constraints and future change.
- "How do you keep a slow report from slowing the whole site?" Expect queues, caching or background jobs.
- "How do you prevent one user from seeing another user's data?" Expect authorisation, policies and tests.
- "What do you test, and what do you not test?" A thoughtful answer focuses on risk, such as payments and permissions.
- "How do you handle a database change on a live system?" Look for migrations, backups and careful release steps.
- "Tell me about a mistake you made on a project and what you did." Honesty is the signal.
- "How do you work with a designer or front-end developer?" Shows collaboration.
- "How would you estimate this feature?" A good developer asks questions before answering.
- "What would you do in the first two weeks on this project?" Expect understanding, setup and a small early delivery.
For more technical depth, ask about the N+1 query problem, mass assignment protection, how queues retry failed jobs, and how they would deploy an update without downtime. Vague answers to these are a meaningful warning.
Run a paid trial
Interviews only show so much. The best test is real work, paid fairly.
- A small task. A limited feature or fix, taking a few days, that resembles the real job.
- Clear acceptance criteria. So you can judge the result objectively.
- Observe the process. How do they communicate, ask questions and handle feedback?
- Review the result. Is the code readable and tested? Does it do what was asked?
Paying for the trial is fair and attracts serious candidates. It also gives both sides a low-risk way to decide. Many of our clients start with a limited engagement and expand it after a few weeks, which is the approach we describe in how to choose a software development company.
Engagement models
How you hire changes cost, flexibility and risk.
- Full-time employee. Deepest knowledge and control, slowest and most expensive to start.
- Dedicated developer. One developer works on your product through a provider, usually on a monthly basis.
- Part-time developer. A fixed number of days or hours each week, suited to maintenance and smaller roadmaps.
- Fixed-scope project. An agreed scope, timeline and price for a defined piece of work.
- Team extension. A developer who joins your own team, tools and processes.
If you already have a mobile or full-stack team, you may also want to add other specialists. See hire mobile app developers and hire Node.js developers for related options.
Red flags
Watch for these during hiring.
- No questions about your business. A developer who goes straight to technology has not understood the problem.
- Claims of knowing everything. Good developers talk about trade-offs and limits.
- Cannot explain past work. They cannot say what they did or why.
- No tests, no version control. Basic professional practices should be habits.
- Guaranteed timelines without questions. A confident date with no analysis is a guess.
- Criticising every previous client. Patterns of blame suggest communication trouble.
- Reluctance to do a trial or show work. Good developers welcome evidence.
- Unusually low rates. Quality costs money. A price far below the market often means inexperience or corners cut.
- Code not in your repository. You should own and access everything.
- Poor communication from the start. It will not improve once the project begins.
Common mistakes
- Hiring on rate alone. Cheap mistakes are expensive to fix.
- Skipping the brief. Without a clear brief, you cannot judge fit.
- Hiring a single person for everything. Design, testing and server work are separate skills.
- No plan for continuity. What happens if the developer is unavailable? Documentation and shared access help.
- No regular reviews. Insist on demos of working software, not just promises.
- Ignoring culture and communication fit. Daily collaboration matters.
Working well after you hire
Good hiring is only half the job. To get the best from your developer:
- Give clear priorities. One ordered list beats many urgent requests.
- Provide context. Explain users and goals, not just tasks.
- Agree a rhythm. Regular check-ins and demos keep everyone aligned.
- Give timely feedback. Small corrections early save large ones later.
- Pay and respect promptly. Good developers have choices.
- Ensure documentation. Decisions and setup steps should be written down.
For background on how we run projects, see our approach.
A hiring checklist
- I have a written description of what I need built.
- I know the experience level the work requires.
- I have seen real projects and understood the candidate's role.
- A technical person has reviewed their work, or I have run a trial.
- They asked good questions about my business.
- I understand the engagement model, cost and notice period.
- The code will live in my repository, and I will have access to everything.
- We have agreed communication, reporting and demo rhythms.
- There is a plan for continuity if they become unavailable.
Final thoughts
Hiring a Laravel developer is less about finding someone who knows the framework and more about finding someone who builds dependable systems, communicates honestly and cares about your outcome. Look at real work, ask reasoning questions, run a small paid trial and trust evidence over promises.
If you would like a developer or team who has already been through that filter, tell us about your project. We will suggest an engagement model and introduce you to the person who would work on it before you commit.